Welcome. This blog was created share the happenings of my life, and thoughts on issues pertaining to whatever I'm interested in. Much as I am apolitical (I rather not take sides), I often blog about sociopolitical and socioeconomic matters.

Saturday, August 27, 2011

What makes a champion?

In Singapore, we believe to a large extent that we all should be Number 1. However, this is quite impossible, or the term Number 1 would lose its meaning. How then should we reconcile being a Number 2 and accepting it? Disclaimer: this belief is more prevalent in the upper strata of society, and is not limited to only Singapore.

When should we be happy, satisfied of what we have achieved?

Is a champion an objective label of a winner, a performer, a number-one? Is a champion someone privileged, an all-rounder, someone who has a niche area?

I say a champion is one who never quits, one who tries his/her best, one who is secure in his/her abilities yet not complacent, who is keen to learn and willing to impart. This makes the term "champion" relative.

The greatest champions are possibly those who surpass themselves, to have achieved "in spite of" everything. Of course, achievement is relative too. Achievement could be easily equated to "what you want". If you want nothing, you have nothing, you have achieved everything. If you want something, you have something but not quite the thing you hope to achieve, work harder. Having done all, enjoy what you have. If you don't, achieving all you want doesn't make you happy either.

You don't have to prove to anyone anything.